Proof Review: Robin Hood (2010)

Release Date
May 14, 2010
Director
Ridley Scott
Screenplay
Brian Helgeland
Distributed By
Universal Pictures
Budget
$200 million
Action, Adventure, Drama
Rated PG-13 for violence, including intense sequences of warfare, and some sexual content
140 minutes

Robin Hood

The 21st Century version of Robin Hood is not your mom and dad’s Robin Hood. Most know Robin Hood the outlaw, set with his merry men and Maid Marian, stealing from the rich and giving to the poor and portrayed by the likes of Kevin Costner. Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood, however, dares to look at an unseen Robin Hood lore, where Russell Crowe delves into Robin Longside, who is simply looking to fight alongside his fellow man.

When the King Richard the Lionheart dies, Longside ventures home with a crew of men. On the way, they come upon an ambush instigated by Sir Godfrey (Mark Strong). Taking the King’s crown back to England and impersonating knights, one of which, Robert Loxley, requests his sword be rightfully returned to his father, Longside becomes caught up in a scheme by Loxley’s father, Sir Walter (Max von Sydow) to keep the family farm in possession of Lady Marian (Cate Blanchett).

The cast of Robin Hood is absolutely superb. Russell Crowe brings a sophistication to film unlike any other actor. Ridley Scott appears to bring out the best of Russell Crowe as they continue their exhilarating work together (Gladiator, A Good Year, Body of Lies, American Gangster). Pair Russell Crowe with the likes of Cate Blanchett and you have succeed in compiling a timeless piece, bringing a new life to the age old characters of Robin Hood. Think of the best villains in the passed few years and Mark Strong is bound to come to mind. Strong has made his rounds as the villain lately, as the 19th Century villain of Sherlock Holmes (2009), the 21st Century villain of Kick Ass (2010), and now, the 13th Century villain of Robin Hood (2010).

Robin Hood entertains in a way most action adventure time pieces fail to, with too much emphasis on the lore and not enough reliance on the performances and lighthearted dialogue. The story does get complicated at times, but Robin Hood takes a genre that is unlikely to win any big time awards and brings it right up to the line of being worthy of winning awards. How films like The Young Victoria, though are considered over films like Robin Hood, I will never quite understand, but Robin Hood remains compelling and worthy of acclamation.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s