Proof Review: The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)

Release Date
December 19, 2001
Director
Peter Jackson
Screenplay
Fran Walsh
Philippa Boyens
Peter Jackson
Based On The Novel By
J.R.R. Tolkien
Distributed By
New Line Cinema
Budget
$93 million
Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Science Fiction
Rated PG-13 for epic battle sequences and some scary images
178 minutes

The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring

J.R.R. Tolkien and Peter Jackson are both pioneers. The first time you read or see “The Lord of the Rings”, it is nothing short of a masterpiece. And that respect grows with each passing time you see the film or read the massive novel. How Tolkien could have had such an imagination to create an entirely new world and spin such an epic adventure with new races, familiar faces, and entirely new languages is incomprehensible. How Jackson could then have such a vision from these 50 year old words is just as miraculous.

“The Fellowship of the Ring” sets the bar for first films in a trilogy, allowing the slow play of introducing all of its title characters, including the hobbits: Bilbo (Ian Holm), Frodo (Elijah Wood), Samwise (Sean Astin), Merry (Dominic Monaghan), and Pippin (Billy Boyd), and their close wizard friend, Gandalf (Academy Award nominated Ian McKellen). We become settled in with these characters in their quiet existence in Hobbiton, all while learning the lore of Middle Earth through Bilbo’s previous journey, chronicled in Tolkien’s previous novel, “The Hobbit”. The looming threat of the ring and the eventual progression of the hobbits’ adventures is unmatched by any epic adventure film.

The supporting characters are just as impressive, with an all-star ensemble cast filling out the Fellowship, including Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), who steals the show for the second half of the film, who is the rightful heir to the throne of men and lover to Arwen the elf (Liv Tyler), Legolas (Orlando Bloom), the bow-and-arrow expert elf, Gimli (John Rhys-Davies), the axe wielding dwarf, and Boromir (Sean Bean), the shifty looking prince of Gondor. All of them have their part to play, and they play it wonderfully, never skipping a beat. One their adventure, they all have their certain crescendo moments that bring them to light, and though we play it much slower with these characters, we get a greater sense of their involvement as the miles pass.

Sauron and Saruman (Christopher Lee) are both appropriate levels of evil to encapsulate the perfect villains for such a high level of epic adventure. Without seeing them almost at all in “The Fellowship of the Ring”, it is a testament to yet another perfectly executed slow play. Instead, the audience is introduced to several of the main villains’ “henchmen” including the darkly cloaked and terrifying nine Ring-wraiths or Nazgûl, the plentiful Orcs, and the Orcs 2.0; the Uruk-hai, who are tormented former elves built to destroy. Even the fan favorite villain, Gollum (Andy Serkis), is weaved into the story slowly. All of these allow for several epic battles and creepy moments, all while never really allowing one to get too close to the actual villains, which is extremely fitting given the extensive run-time of these films and the idea of actual warfare.

The first film of “The Lord of the Rings” has the perfect arc, with everything one needs to get invested, with several epic battles, several love stories, the theme of camaraderie, heartbreaking moments, and overall a sense of moving forward into the unknown. “The Fellowship of the Ring” proves the full extent the human imagination can go and with two more films to follow, it is baffling to imagine what the film-makers felt when stepping up to such a massive undertaking for the first time.

The sheer mass of costume design, set design, and location scouting is insurmountable, all of which are expertly supported by some of the best visual effects ever created for film, some of the most creative and sweeping cinematography, and absolutely no bounds to where this series could go. From scene one, you are immersed in this new world and never taken out of it, whether its the two-and-a-half hours you devote to the theatrical version or the three-and-a-half you prolong into the extended cut. No matter the length of time, “The Fellowship of the Ring” is a labor of love and a feat of what it is to call one’s self a film-maker and a storyteller.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s